15 Shocking Facts About Power Mobility You Didn't Know
Power Mobility and Safety Concerns
Power mobility allows individuals who are in long-term care in their everyday activities and leisure activities. However, the devices can also create safety concerns that need to be addressed.
Rather than exclude residents with certain diagnoses from the power mobility option that could be considered risk management that is prejudicial, the majority of participants chose to take an approach based on teleology and allow all residents to trial the power mobility device.
Mobility
A power mobility device enables people who are disabled to move around their community or home and take part in daily activities that are otherwise impossible for them. These devices could be a danger not just to the individual using them but also to others who share their space or the space. Occupational therapists should carefully consider the safety needs of each client before making recommendations about powered mobility.
In an exploratory study (von Zweck, 1999), OTs from three residential care facilities of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority conducted qualitative interviews with residents regarding their power mobility use. The goal was to develop a framework for client-centered power mobility prescribing. The findings revealed four main themes: (1) power mobility meaning, (2) learning road rules, (3) red flags - safety concerns and (4) solutions.
Power mobility can boost the quality of life for individuals with mobility limitations. This is because it allows them to take part in daily activities at home as well as in the community. Participation in self-care, productive and leisure occupations is vital to physical and mental health for older adults and for a lot of people with progressive diseases power mobility can be the opportunity to keep participating in these important activities.
It was considered unacceptable by the participants to take away a wheelchair in order to alter their life's narrative and direction, and prevent them from doing the same things they were doing before their condition worsened. This was especially applicable to those in the Facility 1 who had only been in a position to use their power chair for a brief period and were now dependent on others to push them.
Another solution would be to limit the speed at which some residents drive their chairs. However, this could raise several issues, including privacy and the impact on the rest of the community. The most drastic solution to safety concerns was to get rid of a resident's wheelchair.
Safety
Power mobility allows those with disabilities to get around more freely, participate in a wider range of activities and do around. However, with increased mobility comes a greater risk for accidents. These accidents can cause serious injuries for certain. This is why it is crucial to think about the safety of your client before recommending that they use power mobility.
The first step in determining safety is to determine if your client can safely operate their scooter or power wheelchair. This could include an examination of the physical by a physician or occupational therapist, or a mobility specialist, depending on the nature of your client's disability and their current health. In certain situations your client will require a vehicle lift to be able to load and unload the device at their home, community or workplace.
Another aspect of safety is knowing the rules of the road. This involves sharing space with other pedestrians, other wheelchair users, and drivers of trucks, cars or buses. A majority of the participants have mentioned this issue.
Some people learned to drive their wheelchairs on sidewalks instead of driving in busy areas or on curbs (unless the wheelchair was designed for this). Others drove slower and looked out for pedestrians in an area that was crowded.
The final and least preferred option was to remove the chair of a person, which was seen as two-fold punishment: losing independent mobility and preventing access to facilities and community activities. Diane and Harriet, among others, were among the participants who were stripped of their chairs.
Participants also suggested that residents, family members, and staff members be educated on the safe use of power mobility. This could involve teaching the basics of driving (such as using the right side of the hallway) and encouraging residents to practice driving strategies when they leave and helping them understand how their actions can affect the mobility of others.
Follow-Up
The capacity and willingness of a child to participate in life can be profoundly affected by a power mobility device. There isn't much research on the experiences children have when learning to use these devices. This study employs a post-previous design to examine the effects of 6 months of using one of four early mobility devices on a school-aged group of children with severe cerebral palsy (CP).
Qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 parents as well as pediatric occupational and physical therapists. Thematic analysis revealed three main themes. The first theme, 'Power for mobility', described how the use of a powered device affected more than just the child's motor skills. The experience of learning to drive a motorized mobility device can be an emotional and transformative one.
The second theme , 'There's no recipe book' showed that the process of learning to make use of the mobility device was a process that took place in a cyclical manner over time. Therapists were charged with determining the most appropriate solution for each child's needs and abilities. During the training phase and after, therapists had to be patient with children and parents. Several parents and therapists described the need to assist families celebrate their successes and solve challenges associated with the training process.
Finally, the third theme"Shared space', explored the ways in which using an electric device can have an impact on other people's lives and interactions. The majority of the participants in this study believed that people should always be considerate when using a power device. This is particularly true when driving in public spaces. green power mobility scooters uk mentioned that they've had to deal with instances where another's property was damaged through the use of a power mobility device, or when a person was injured by a driver who not yielded the right-of-way.
Overall, the results of this study suggest that short-term power mobility and socialization training appears feasible for preschoolers with CP in certain classroom environments. Future research should be focused on the effectiveness of training and outcomes of this type of intervention with young children with CP. This could result in the development of more standard training protocols for this group.